Mephistopheles Has Found his Faust

By Sadhika on

I have a sneaking suspicion that the spirit of Mephistopheles is at large in the world today. Even as I write this, it sounds like an overblown and slightly deranged diagnosis of a lot that is currently wrong with public psyche. But I have my reasons for this somewhat strange idea. 

To give more context, Mephistopheles is Goethe's devil in Faust, a figure born from the darker edges of the world. He strikes a deal with God, wagering that he can corrupt Faust, a doctor and scholar whose faith lies in reason and science, unswayed by the divine. Faust, in his relentless search for meaning, becomes the perfect prey for Mephistopheles' whispered promises of worldly pleasure and knowledge beyond limits. Mephistopheles, however, is not just evil for its own sake. He stands as the embodiment of negation, of doubt, of the ceaseless struggle against creation itself. His essence is captured in his own words: "I am the spirit that denies!" 

Nietzsche would recognize in Mephistopheles what he calls the "spirit of the naysayer"—the force that negates, denies, and seeks to tear down rather than build. For Nietzsche, this spirit opposes life itself, standing in contrast to the will to power, the drive to affirm existence and create meaning. Mephistopheles, in his essence, is the ultimate "naysayer," undermining Faust’s thirst for knowledge and experience by sowing seeds of doubt and disillusionment. Like Nietzsche's naysayer, Mephistopheles embodies the cynical, life-denying force that mocks creation, scorning any striving for greatness, whispering in the ear of every creative soul: "Why bother?"

The reason I assert, with such grim certainty, that the spirit of negation is at large today is because I observe the same “nay-saying” impulse underpinning the corrosive ideologies that have taken hold of the modern psyche. The pro-abortion movement, the assault on the nuclear family, the climate change alarmism, overpopulation myths and anti-natalism and the radical trans agenda all point to the same underlying belief: that creation, whether it be life itself or the cultural achievements of civilization, is inherently flawed, corrupt, and deserving of annihilation. 

Protect the sexual liberty of impulsive women, but not the lives of unborn children. Defend pronouns and identities, but mutilate healthy bodies, rendering people unable to have children. Make divorce as easy as possible, because "it just isn’t working anymore," even if it leaves birthrates to plummet. Save the planet, but not humanity. In short, the message is clear: human life itself is offensive. We are being asked to embrace the belief that mankind is a scourge upon the earth, and its eradication, or at least its diminishment, is a moral imperative. And, as history has shown time and again, when people are convinced that their acts of cruelty are justified by a higher moral purpose, the results are always catastrophic. 

Art, literature, and beauty, once considered essential expressions of the human spirit, are now treated with contempt, vandalised by protestors, and dismissed as relics of an oppressive past or the indulgences of a privileged elite. The agents of Mephistopheles—those who seek to deny rather than affirm—have no use for creation in any form. They champion only deconstruction, replacing beauty with ugliness, complexity with slogans, and depth with shallow, ideological messages. Art becomes propaganda, its purpose no longer to elevate or inspire, but to indoctrinate and degrade.

And it does not stop there. Once the value of life and creation is denied, the justification for violence, crime, and even genocide becomes easier to articulate. Thus, we see how the nihilistic undercurrent of these movements, masked as compassion or justice, paves the way for acts of destruction previously unthinkable. The agents of Mephistopheles believe that their moral vision justifies any act, no matter how destructive. They have adopted, as their creed, the same dark philosophy that Mephistopheles whispers in Faust’s ear: "Everything that comes to be, deserves to perish." 

As I reflect on this darkness, I am reminded of my grandmother, who stands as a custodian of the values under assault today. She has faced more loss than most could endure, but she taught my family the importance of not dwelling forever in mourning, of living despite it all. Hindus typically refrain from celebrating festivals or joyous occasions within a year of a family member’s death, but she—having been widowed with teenage children to raise—understood the value of celebrating life. She taught her family, especially the children, to wear colour, to eat well, to celebrate even during mourning. Her wisdom is not wrapped in lofty ideas or grand philosophical statements; she has never heard of Mephistopheles, nor would she be interested in the ideological battles of today’s world. I wonder what she would say to the life-denial that now prevails.

Illustration by Harry Clarke for a 1925 edition of Goethe's Faust

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Last Keeper

By Sadhika on
Image
Of late, there has been a feeling settling in my chest like dust in an empty room—soft, silent, and certain. It is the quiet realization that my memories are not permanent things. Not chiseled into stone or sealed up in iron-bound books, but written in pencil, the graphite growing faint with each passing season. I am aware, now more than ever, that what I remember will not be remembered for long. I think of my parents often. I remember my mother in her early sarees —floral, soft, like the curtains of a spring house. As the years passed, her colours dulled. Maybe they matched her age better, or maybe they just matched her mood. I see her now in my mind, young, barefoot and newly married, in a kitchen not yet hers, lifting a spoon to her mother’s lips and asking if the peas were soft enough. What was her scent like?  Turmeric?   Talcum powder? Or those white rajnigandha flowers she loved so much? I don’t remember. I think of my father and the way he used to hum when he shaved, a...
Read more

A Village Denied

By Sadhika on
Image
Co-authored by  Shrankhla and Sadhika on August 28, 2025 Of all the deprivations visited upon modern childhood, none is so grave and yet so little acknowledged as the absence of other people. Those of us who grew up in fuller households know what today’s children are missing. We remember weddings where ten different families would squeeze into one house, sleeping on the floor, with cousins lined up like sardines. We remember giving up one’s own bed to an elderly uncle, and waking up to the sound of aunties and uncles gossiping arguing over tea. In those homes, very little belonged entirely to us. The bed we slept on, the food on our plate, not even our stories. Someone was always listening in, correcting us, mocking us, softening our triumphs with their own, or placing a hand on our shoulders when we faltered. It was infuriating. It was also how we learned that life is not designed for any one person’s comfort—least of all a child’s. Siblings taught us this brutally and tende...
Read more

So begins our undoing

By Sadhika on
In rich aplomb we sit Atop the piles of gold and good That we write to our credit, When the good Lady Fortune’s scales tip And the waves of Chaos come gushing in From directions unventured, To lay waste to our kingdoms. So begins our undoing. Then a shadow confronts us To which, earlier, we became privy Only in brief flashes of thought or dream, And brushed away with impatience. The darkest among us have a still darker self Long lost and buried Beneath the best of us. The old altars lay slighted, Our ideals bear no resemblance  To the names we gave them. We are ruled by Furies aplenty. How do we rebuild our fallen kingdoms Without Divine Guidance? Somewhere along our final descent, We meet the gods we banished. A faint glow (perhaps even imagined)  Beckons across the waste yonder. Do we follow? Or do we give in to the darkness? 
Read more